Not another bland car that is also used as the official Chevrolet representative in NASCAR needs to have more flavor, power and options. Though it was at this year’s Chicago Auto Show (pictured), it was parked just like any other Chevrolet, no special promotion or recognition.īut lets have some fun and create what should be the Chevrolet SS replacement should be. I didn’t see the car shown in production form at the Chicagoland Speedway during the NASCAR races here this past fall. Chevrolet didn’t not bring the car to the 2013 Chicago auto show and I asked where it was and though it’s first production year was 2014, I thought having it at the auto show would be good for “getting the word out”. Not sure if that would work because the current SS has plenty of power, isn’t showy but when I finally saw it earlier this year, its nice, not the bad ass that it should be.Īlso cars don’t sell themselves, Chevrolet needs to promote the car, just being in NASCAR isn’t enough. However the Impala SS of the mid 1990’s (1994-1996), is a collectible, it had the Corvette engine of the day (5.7 liter LT1), and was subtle yet very cool. Though you’d think then the car would be a collectible with growing value and its not that either. Which brings the next question, what will be Chevrolet’s large performance car? Now the obvious answer is to offer the next Impala with an SS package but the last two times that was made (2004-2006 with a supercharged V6 & 2006-08 with the 5.3 Liter V8), it also did not sell well.īut large sedan performance cars aren’t big sellers, that’s what the more basic models are for. Not to mention the Holden plant in Australia will close in 2017, so unless that production comes to this side of the Pacific (I doubt it), then the Chevrolet SS will be no more. First remember this is a Australian car (Holden), and like the Holden transplant cars before it the late Pontiac GTO & G8 (also poor sellers), they just didn’t catch on. So from what I understand Chevrolet is not going to make the poor selling Chevrolet after 2017 (per Motor Authority), and I understand why.
#Camaro lightscape software
IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.Over two years ago (June 6, 2012) with the introduction of the Chevrolet SS I wrote “It is good for NASCAR & Us” and I had high hopes for the rear wheel performance car (and so did General Motors), but seems few other people did. THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
#Camaro lightscape free
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions: